1983 • Fiat
Ritmo
Fiat Ritmo 2.0 (130 Hp) 1983Overall Score55.5/100
1983 Fiat Ritmo vs 1983 Opel Manta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Opel
Manta
Opel Manta 2.0 200 (125 Hp) 1983Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Manta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Manta
FiatMakeOpel
RitmoModelManta
1983Model year1983
CoupeBody typeCoupe
—Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Manta
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1979 cc
130 HPPower125 HP
0 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Manta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size195/60 R14
Dimensions
Fiat RitmoSpecificationOpel Manta
—Length4475 mm
—Width1670 mm
—Height1320 mm
—Weight1065 Kg
—Wheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Fiat Ritmo and 1983 Opel Manta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Manta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…