1983 • Fiat
Ritmo
Fiat Ritmo 2.0 (130 Hp) 1983Overall Score55.5/100
1983 Fiat Ritmo vs 1982 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.9 (100 Hp) 1982Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Ritmo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat RitmoSpecificationAudi 100
FiatMakeAudi
RitmoModel100
1983Model year1982
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
3Doors2/4
Performance
Fiat RitmoSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1921 cc
130 HPPower100 HP
0 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Fiat RitmoSpecificationAudi 100
—Length4683 mm
—Width1768 mm
—Height1390 mm
—Weight1170 Kg
—Wheelbase2677 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Fiat Ritmo and 1982 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Ritmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…