DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alpina B10 vs 1999 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B10SpecificationAlpina B3
AlpinaMakeAlpina
B10ModelB3
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina B10SpecificationAlpina B3
6,3 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
262 km/hTop speed266 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
335 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B10SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B10SpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B10SpecificationAlpina B3
4775 mmLength4471 mm
1800 mmWidth1739 mm
1415 mmHeight1395 mm
1540 KgWeight1450 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alpina B10 and 1999 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…