DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Fiat Qubo vs 2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeChery
QuboModelSweet (QQ)
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
77 HPPower53 HP
115 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3959 mmLength3550 mm
1716 mmWidth1508 mm
1735 mmHeight1491 mm
1365 KgWeight850 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Fiat Qubo and 2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…