DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Qubo vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeRenault
QuboModelClio
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,2 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
155 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement899 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
190 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 88T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3959 mmLength4267 mm
1716 mmWidth1732 mm
1735 mmHeight1445 mm
1275 KgWeight1055 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Qubo and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…