DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Fiat Punto vs 2008 Great Wall RUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Punto

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeGreat Wall
PuntoModelRUV
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5-7
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
280 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 H; 185/65 R15 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength5105 mm
1687 mmWidth1785 mm
1490 mmHeight1870 mm
1205 KgWeight1670 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Fiat Punto and 2008 Great Wall RUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Punto leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…