DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Fiat Panda vs 2014 Nissan Pulsar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pulsar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeNissan
PandaModelPulsar
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
168 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank46 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3705 mmLength4387 mm
1662 mmWidth1768 mm
1657 mmHeight1520 mm
1165 KgWeight1190-1304 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Fiat Panda and 2014 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pulsar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…