2016 • Abarth
595
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet (145 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
2016 Abarth 595 vs 2016 Skoda Kodiaq Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Skoda
Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Kodiaq
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Abarth 595SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq
AbarthMakeSkoda
595ModelKodiaq
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5/7
3Doors5
Performance
Abarth 595SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq
7,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
206 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Abarth 595SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Abarth 595SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
194/45 R16Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Abarth 595SpecificationSkoda Kodiaq
3660 mmLength4697 mm
1627 mmWidth1882 mm
1485 mmHeight1655 mm
1035 KgWeight1540/1578 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2791 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Abarth 595 and 2016 Skoda Kodiaq approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Kodiaq leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…