DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Fiat Marea vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeFiat
MareaModelBravo
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
170 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1370 ccEngine displacement1369 cc
80 HPPower80 HP
112 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4378 mmLength4025 mm
1741 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1085 KgWeight985 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Fiat Marea and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…