DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Fiat Fullback vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Triton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMitsubishi
FullbackModelTriton
2017Model year2017
Pick UpBody typePick-up
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
180 HPPower178 HP
430 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5285 mmLength5280 mm
1785 mmWidth1815 mm
1775 mmHeight1780 mm
1855 kgWeight1835 Kg
960 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3000 mm

Additional Features

Fiat FullbackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Fiat Fullback and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Triton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…