2016 • Fiat
Fullback
Fiat Fullback 2.4 (154 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Fiat Fullback vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mitsubishi
Triton
Mitsubishi Triton 2.5 DI-D (178 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Fiat Fullback
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat FullbackSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
FiatMakeMitsubishi
FullbackModelTriton
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Fiat FullbackSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
169 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
154 HPPower178 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat FullbackSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat FullbackSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/70 R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat FullbackSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
5285 mmLength5280 mm
1785 mmWidth1815 mm
1775 mmHeight1780 mm
1870 KgWeight1835 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Fiat Fullback and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Fullback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…