DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Fiat Freemont vs 2011 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Freemont

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeVolvo
FreemontModelS40
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
77 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/55 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4910 mmLength4476 mm
1878 mmWidth1770 mm
1705 mmHeight1454 mm
1940 KgWeight1498 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Fiat Freemont and 2011 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Freemont leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…