2015 • Fiat
Egea
Fiat Egea Urban 2015 1.6 Multijet 120 HPOverall Score72.5/100
2015 Fiat Egea vs 2013 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.2 (70 Hp) 2013Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Egea
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 22.25 points.
72.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat EgeaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FiatMakeVolkswagen
EgeaModelPolo
2015Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Fiat EgeaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
9,8 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
199 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
120 HPPower70 HP
320 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat EgeaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat EgeaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat EgeaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4532 mmLength3970 mm
1792 mmWidth1682 mm
1497 mmHeight1485 mm
1270 kgWeight1067 Kg
520 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Fiat Egea and 2013 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Egea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 22.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…