DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Fiat Egea HB vs 2022 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4.5 points.

64.25–68.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeFord
Egea HBModelPuma
2017Model year2022
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
192 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement999 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
152 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears7
ATTransmissionAT
16Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4186 mm
1792 mmWidth1805 mm
1495 mmHeight1536 mm
1300 kgWeight1326 kg
440 ltLuggage capacity456 lt

Additional Features

Fiat Egea HBDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford PumaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Fiat Egea HB and 2022 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…