DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Fiat Croma vs 2017 Renault Alaskan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Croma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6.25 points.

76.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeRenault
CromaModelAlaskan
2008Model year2017
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
216 km/hTop speed184 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2298 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
400 NmTorque450 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank73 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size255/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4756 mmLength5399 mm
1775 mmWidth1850 mm
1597 mmHeight1810 mm
1650 KgWeight2103 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Fiat Croma and 2017 Renault Alaskan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…