2005 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 2.2i 16V (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
2005 Fiat Croma vs 2005 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2005Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationKia Optima
FiatMakeKia
CromaModelOptima
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationKia Optima
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
203 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationKia Optima
4756 mmLength4745 mm
1775 mmWidth1815 mm
1597 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight1405 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Fiat Croma and 2005 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…