1995 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1995Overall Score52.25/100
1995 Fiat Croma vs 1995 Rover 600 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Rover
600
Rover 600 1995Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Rover 600
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 600
FiatMakeRover
CromaModel600
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 600
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
94 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 600
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 600
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationRover 600
4520 mmLength4645 mm
1760 mmWidth1715 mm
1430 mmHeight1380 mm
1240 KgWeight1255 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Fiat Croma and 1995 Rover 600 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 600 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…