1995 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1995Overall Score52.25/100
1995 Fiat Croma vs 1995 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.8 (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
FiatMakeMazda
CromaModel626
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
12,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
94 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
4520 mmLength—
1760 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1240 KgWeight—
2660 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Fiat Croma and 1995 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…