1994 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1994Overall Score52.25/100
1994 Fiat Croma vs 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1.8 (N11W) 1994Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
FiatMakeMitsubishi
CromaModelSpace Runner
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
94 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4520 mmLength4290 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1640 mm
1240 KgWeight1228 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Fiat Croma and 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…