DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Fiat Cinquecento vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeCitroen
CinquecentoModelSaxo
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
150 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1108 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
54 HPPower60 HP
88 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3227 mmLength3718 mm
1487 mmWidth1595 mm
1435 mmHeight1390 mm
735 KgWeight780 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Fiat Cinquecento and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…