DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Fiat Cinquecento vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Cinquecento

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeZastava
CinquecentoModelYugo
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h20,1 s
140 km/hTop speed135 km/h
899 ccEngine displacement903 cc
40 HPPower45 HP
65 NmTorque63 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/70 R13Tyre size135/85 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3223 mmLength3490 mm
1487 mmWidth1540 mm
1435 mmHeight1340 mm
710 KgWeight750 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Fiat Cinquecento and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Cinquecento leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…