1998 • Fiat
Cinquecento
Fiat Cinquecento 0.7 i (31 Hp) 1998Overall Score51.5/100
1998 Fiat Cinquecento vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CinquecentoSpecificationMazda Scrum
FiatMakeMazda
CinquecentoModelScrum
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
2Doors4
Performance
Fiat CinquecentoSpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
704 ccEngine displacement657 cc
31 HPPower42 HP
47 NmTorque57 Nm
2Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CinquecentoSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CinquecentoSpecificationMazda Scrum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R13Tyre size145/80 R12 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CinquecentoSpecificationMazda Scrum
3227 mmLength3295 mm
1487 mmWidth1395 mm
1435 mmHeight1870 mm
690 KgWeight780 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Fiat Cinquecento and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…