DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Fiat Bravo vs 2013 Nissan Note Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeNissan
BravoModelNote
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
179 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength4100 mm
1792 mmWidth1695 mm
1498 mmHeight1535 mm
1180 kgWeight1185 Kg
400 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2600 mm

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog Lights
Nissan Note

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Fiat Bravo and 2013 Nissan Note approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…