DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Fiat Bravo vs 2013 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeSkoda
BravoModelOctavia
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
120 HPPower140 HP
206 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength4659 mm
1792 mmWidth1814 mm
1498 mmHeight1461 mm
1235 kgWeight1255 Kg
400 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2686 mm

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Fiat Bravo and 2013 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…