DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Fiat Bravo vs 1998 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Cabriolet

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeAudi
BravoModelCabriolet
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
182 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4366 mm
1755 mmWidth1716 mm
1420 mmHeight1379 mm
1155 KgWeight1390 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Fiat Bravo and 1998 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Cabriolet leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…