1996 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 1996Overall Score56.25/100
1996 Fiat Bravo vs 1996 Lancia Delta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Lancia
Delta
Lancia Delta 1.8 i.e. (103 Hp) 1996Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationLancia Delta
FiatMakeLancia
BravoModelDelta
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationLancia Delta
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1756 cc
113 HPPower103 HP
154 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationLancia Delta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationLancia Delta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationLancia Delta
4025 mmLength4011 mm
1755 mmWidth1703 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1100 KgWeight1102 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Fiat Bravo and 1996 Lancia Delta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…