2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Nissan Note Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Note
Nissan Note 1.6 (110 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Note
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Note
FiatMakeNissan
BravoModelNote
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Note
12,8 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
173 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower110 HP
290 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Note
DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Note
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R15; 185/65 R15; 185/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Note
4336 mmLength4100 mm
1792 mmWidth1690 mm
1498 mmHeight1550 mm
1320 KgWeight1107 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Nissan Note approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Note leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…