DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Fiat Bravo vs 2009 Citroen C2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeCitroen
BravoModelC2
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
195 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
120 HPPower109 HP
300 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank41 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength3666 mm
1792 mmWidth1659 mm
1498 mmHeight1477 mm
1320 KgWeight1122 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Fiat Bravo and 2009 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…