DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Fiat Bravo vs 2008 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeBrilliance
BravoModelM2
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
187 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
290 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank74 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4336 mmLength4648 mm
1792 mmWidth1800 mm
1498 mmHeight1450 mm
1320 KgWeight1455 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Fiat Bravo and 2008 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…