DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Fiat Bravo vs 1996 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeOpel
BravoModelAstra
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
184 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
144 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 82T; 175/65 R14 82T

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4051 mm
1755 mmWidth1696 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
1025 KgWeight1065/1085 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2517 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Fiat Bravo and 1996 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…