1996 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 16V (103 Hp) 1996Overall Score50.25/100
1996 Fiat Bravo vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.7 TD (82 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 323
FiatMakeMazda
BravoModel323
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 323
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
184 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
144 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationMazda 323
4025 mmLength4340 mm
1755 mmWidth1710 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1025 KgWeight1170 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Fiat Bravo and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…