DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Fiat Bravo vs 1998 Tofas Tipo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeTofas
BravoModelTipo
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
168 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1370 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
75 HPPower76 HP
112 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength3958 mm
1755 mmWidth1700 mm
1420 mmHeight1445 mm
1010 KgWeight990 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Fiat Bravo and 1998 Tofas Tipo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…