1997 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 (182.AG) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
1997 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.4 SX (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
FiatMakeCitroen
BravoModelSaxo
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
13,9 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
168 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1370 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
112 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
4025 mmLength3718 mm
1755 mmWidth1595 mm
1420 mmHeight1390 mm
1010 KgWeight840 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…