DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeCitroen
BravoModelXsara
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
168 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1370 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
112 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4167 mm
1755 mmWidth1698 mm
1420 mmHeight1405 mm
1010 KgWeight955 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…