2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 (182.AA) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Fiat Bravo vs 1995 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.4 (182.AA) 1995Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationFiat Bravo
FiatMakeFiat
BravoModelBravo
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationFiat Bravo
13,7 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
174 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1369 ccEngine displacement1369 cc
80 HPPower80 HP
112 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7 ltAverage consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationFiat Bravo
4025 mmLength4025 mm
1755 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
985 KgWeight985 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Bravo and 1995 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…