1998 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.2 16V 80 (82 Hp) 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.3 i 16V (82 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Colt
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
FiatMakeMitsubishi
BravoModelColt
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
12,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
173 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
82 HPPower82 HP
113 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4025 mmLength3880 mm
1755 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1365 mm
985 KgWeight945 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2415 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…