DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAudi
MiToModelA3
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/3Doors3

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
198 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
320 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4060 mmLength4237 mm
1720 mmWidth1777 mm
1440 mmHeight1421 mm
1205 KgWeight1230 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…