DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Fiat Albea vs 2000 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points.

51.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeVolkswagen
AlbeaModelBora
2003Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
180 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
103 HPPower204 HP
145 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
175/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4185 mmLength4376 mm
1705 mmWidth1735 mm
1490 mmHeight1446 mm
1075 KgWeight1570 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Fiat Albea and 2000 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…