2012 • Fiat
Albea
Fiat Albea Active Plus 2012 1.3 Multijet 70 HPOverall Score60.25/100
2012 Fiat Albea vs 2012 Chery Kimo (A1) Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
-2012-Teknik-Ozellikleri.jpg)
2012 • Chery
Kimo (A1)
Chery Kimo (A1) 1.3i (83 Hp) 2012Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Albea
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat AlbeaSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
FiatMakeChery
AlbeaModelKimo (A1)
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat AlbeaSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
14,5 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
70 HPPower83 HP
180 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat AlbeaSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat AlbeaSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
14Tyre size175/60 R14
NoABS—
Dimensions
Fiat AlbeaSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
4186 mmLength3700 mm
1703 mmWidth1578 mm
1490 mmHeight1527 mm
1085 kgWeight1070 Kg
515 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2390 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Fiat Albea and 2012 Chery Kimo (A1) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Albea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…