DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2017 Hyundai Celesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Celesta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeHyundai
MiToModelCelesta
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
219 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1353 cc
170 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque211 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 TCTGears7 DCT
215/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4405 mm
1720 mmWidth1750 mm
1446 mmHeight1485 mm
1170 KgWeight1248 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2017 Hyundai Celesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Celesta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…