DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFiat
MiToModelBravo
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/3Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
198 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
206 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4336 mm
1720 mmWidth1792 mm
1440 mmHeight1498 mm
1145 KgWeight1320 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…