DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
MiToModelClio
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2/3Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
135 HPPower120 HP
206 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4060 mmLength—
1720 mmWidth—
1440 mmHeight—
1135 KgWeight1199 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…