DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2012 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
MiToModelFusion
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/3Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
165 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
78 HPPower68 HP
120 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4060 mmLength4013 mm
1720 mmWidth1724 mm
1440 mmHeight1543 mm
1080 KgWeight1105 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2486 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2012 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…