DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Toyota Probox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
MiToModelProbox
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
85 HPPower88 HP
200 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption—
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4195 mm
1720 mmWidth1695 mm
1446 mmHeight1525 mm
1150 KgWeight1030 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Toyota Probox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…