DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2012 Mitsubishi i Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMitsubishi
MiToModeli
2015Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
875 ccEngine displacement659 cc
105 HPPower64 HP
145 NmTorque94 Nm
2Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
195/55 R16Tyre size145/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength3395 mm
1720 mmWidth1475 mm
1446 mmHeight1600 mm
1130 KgWeight900 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2012 Mitsubishi i approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…