DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 FAW Vita vs 2007 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Vita

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW VitaSpecificationMazda 2
FAWMakeMazda
VitaModel2
2007Model year2007
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

FAW VitaSpecificationMazda 2
14,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
178 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
100 HPPower68 HP
130 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW VitaSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW VitaSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

FAW VitaSpecificationMazda 2
4245 mmLength3925 mm
1680 mmWidth1680 mm
1500 mmHeight1545 mm
1020 KgWeight1085 Kg
2425 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 FAW Vita and 2007 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Vita leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…