DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 FAW Vita vs 2010 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Vita

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW VitaSpecificationOpel Combo
FAWMakeOpel
VitaModelCombo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

FAW VitaSpecificationOpel Combo
14,3 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
172 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1342 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
92 HPPower75 HP
114 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW VitaSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW VitaSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

FAW VitaSpecificationOpel Combo
3855 mmLength4322 mm
1680 mmWidth1684 mm
1500 mmHeight1801 mm
955 KgWeight1278 Kg
2425 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 FAW Vita and 2010 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Vita leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…