DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 FAW Jetta vs 2005 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Jetta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW JettaSpecificationOpel Combo
FAWMakeOpel
JettaModelCombo
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

FAW JettaSpecificationOpel Combo
13,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
135 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW JettaSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW JettaSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW JettaSpecificationOpel Combo
4385 mmLength4320 mm
1674 mmWidth1685 mm
1415 mmHeight1800 mm
1060 KgWeight1260 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2751 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 FAW Jetta and 2005 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Jetta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…