DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 FAW Bora vs 2011 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW BoraSpecificationVolvo C30
FAWMakeVolvo
BoraModelC30
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

FAW BoraSpecificationVolvo C30
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
216 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

FAW BoraSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW BoraSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW BoraSpecificationVolvo C30
4376 mmLength4266 mm
1735 mmWidth1782 mm
1446 mmHeight1447 mm
1380 KgWeight1450 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 FAW Bora and 2011 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…