DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 FAW Bora vs 2009 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW BoraSpecificationFord Mondeo
FAWMakeFord
BoraModelMondeo
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

FAW BoraSpecificationFord Mondeo
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
216 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
150 HPPower125 HP
210 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW BoraSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW BoraSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW BoraSpecificationFord Mondeo
4376 mmLength4844 mm
1735 mmWidth1886 mm
1446 mmHeight1500 mm
1380 KgWeight1503 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 FAW Bora and 2009 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…